Modern Psychology in Support of Nussbaum’s Universalist Approach
Article
Abstract
[In English]
In this essay the author critically examines possible objections to Nussbaum’s universalist approach and shows how modern psychology can support her conviction in the existence of a single universal norm of goodness and refute the counterarguments of cultural relativism which holds that a universal norm of goodness cannot be rationally justified; that there are many norms of good life (eudaimonia) and they are all defined by their respective cultural settings. The author will also demonstrate the functional value of subjective well-being for universalist approach in virtue ethics and will prove that subjective well-being is a perfect universal criterion of goodness.
Downloads
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
This journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions. Topos Journal uses CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 license (license URL: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0).