The Marketism Conundrum: How to Proactively Achieve Proportionality in Institutions?.

Article

  • Gregory Sandstrom
Keywords: Ideology, Neoliberalism, Neoconservatism, Systems, Western, Eastern, Global, Proactionary, Precautionary, Institutions, Post-neoclassical, Proportionality

Abstract

[In English]

Rather than facing neoliberalism and markets as two-sides of the same capitalistic coin, the paper acknowledges that neoconservatism also should be involved in the conversation as a comparison of ideologies. As a way to move beyond the current left vs. right political spectrum, a new contrast is presented between the precautionary and proactionary principles, through the work of Steve Fuller. Likewise a way to measure the institutionalisation of precautionary and proactionary principles is confronted in the Institutional Matrix Theory of Svetlana Kirdina. The paper concludes by suggesting that a post-neoclassical approach aimed at achieving proportionality can provide benefits in both research and practise by harmonising the dynamics of institutional change in the areas of politics, economics and ideology.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Published
2016-06-01
How to Cite
Sandstrom, G. (2016). The Marketism Conundrum: How to Proactively Achieve Proportionality in Institutions?. Topos, (2-3), 42-56. Retrieved from https://journals.ehu.lt/index.php/topos/article/view/258
Issue
No 2-3 (2015): Neoliberal Rationality: Social and Anthropological Implications of Marketism
Section
MARKETISM: DIAGNOSIS AND ALTERNATIVES

This journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions. Topos Journal uses CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 license (license URL: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0).